Posts Tagged ‘Media Bias’

Bye bye Al-Jazeera!

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

Good news:

The Government Press Office in Jerusalem will not provide services to the al-Jazeera television network in the wake of a festive show organized in honor of terrorist Samir Kuntar upon his return to Lebanon. (Ynet)

Next should be CNN & BBC!

Sphere: Related Content

Google Earth: A New Platform for Anti-Israel Propaganda and Replacement Geography

Friday, June 27th, 2008
  • Virtual Israel, as represented by Google Earth, is littered with orange dots, many of which claim to represent “Palestinian localities evacuated and destroyed after the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.” Thus, Israel is depicted as a state born out of colonial conquest rather than the return of a people from exile. Each dot links to the “Palestine Remembered” site, where further information advancing this narrative can be obtained.
  • Many of the claims staked out in Google Earth present misinformation, and sites known to be ruins in 1946 are claimed to be villages destroyed in 1948. Arab villages which still exist today are listed as sites of destruction. The Google Earth initiative is not only creating a virtual Palestine, it is creating a falsification of history.
  • The concept of “replacement geography” replaces the historical connection of one people to the land with a connection between another people and the land. The inclusion of virtual Palestine, superimposed on Israel in the core layer of Google Earth, is an example of replacement geography advanced by technology.
  • Those wishing to explore Israel in Google Earth are immediately taken to a politically motivated narrative unrelated to their quest. Google should remove the narrative and treat Israel as it treats every other country on the globe. The core layer of Google Earth should be ideology free and not serve as a platform for indoctrination or a campaign to wipe Israel off the virtual map.
The influence of the Internet on our lives is increasing. News, advertising, employment, education, and networking are being affected. Israel’s security is especially vulnerable to the manipulation of geography. The online world allows the creation of a virtual reality that at times bears only passing resemblance to facts on the ground. The gap between reality and virtual reality is further exploited by political activists promoting what we term “replacement geography,” a means of controlling the virtual representation of land in place of controlling the land itself. In an information age, control on the common map may be worth more in negotiations than control on the ground.

Google Earth

With a user base of 400 million,1 Google Earth uses satellite imagery combined with maps, terrain, and 3D buildings to present the earth at various levels of magnification. Key features (geography, place details, pictures, etc.) are included with the download of Google Earth in what is known as a “core layer.” Users can also download “custom layers” created by other users, which provide educational, historical, or special interest information to be accessed by those wishing to take the Google Earth experience further.
The Google Earth website was the 8th most searched for website in the UK at the start of 2006.2 The user base in June 2007 was 200 million,3 up 100 percent from reports10 months earlier.4 The application has broad appeal, with almost a quarter of the visitors to Google Earth over the age of 55.5 Google Earth has been used by campaign groups to raise public awareness; examples include grass roots environmental campaigns that created a layer with information against deforestation; a WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) layer showing large-scale environmental and socioeconomic shifts; and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum which created a layer with information on the crisis in Darfur. These projects were custom layers which users could add to Google Earth.6

Virtual Reality

Virtual Israel, as represented by Google Earth, is littered with dozens of orange dots. Orange dots represent contributions from the user community, and those appearing by default have been accepted into the core layout by Google Earth. In the case of Israel, most of these dots claim to represent “one of the Palestinian localities evacuated and destroyed after the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.” For example, Ramat Aviv, the site of Tel Aviv University, appears as Al Shaykh Muwannis. While generally Google Earth does not erase Israeli towns and kibbutzim, it has heavily integrated a politically motivated Palestinian narrative into the map of Israel. As a result, Israel is depicted as a state born out of colonial conquest rather than the return of a people from exile. Each orange dot links to the “Palestine Remembered” site, where custom layers which further advance this narrative can be obtained.
Early press reports portrayed the virtual Palestine initiative as documentation of fact and included Israeli comments that it was “biased but legitimate.”7 Later research showed that many of the claims staked out in Google Earth were presenting misinformation. Kiryat Yam was wrongly claimed to be built on the Palestinian village of Ghawarina. Many sites known to be ruins in 1946 are claimed to be villages destroyed in 1948. Arab villages which still exist today are listed as sites of destruction.8 The Google Earth initiative is not only creating a virtual Palestine, it is creating a falsification of history.
Google Earth’s core information also includes other problems. Previously, areas beyond the “green line” were labelled as “Occupied Territories,” a phraseology which is sometimes used to justify terrorism, rather than “disputed territories.”9 The area listed as “occupied” also included the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.10 Google Earth places Mt. Scopus and its Hebrew University campusin Jerusalem within Jordanian territory prior to 1967, even though it was an area where Israel exercised control during that period, according to the 1949 Armistice Agreement.
In March 2008 theGaza Strip was still listed as “Israeli-occupied,” despite Israel’s full withdrawal in 2005 and the military takeover of the Strip by Hamas in mid-2007. By May 2008 (after press coverage), the label was changed to read “Gaza Strip.” A note states: “Many sources still regard the GazaStrip as ‘Israeli-occupied’ despite formal Israeli withdrawal in September 2005.”11 There is still no mention of Hamas‘ control.

Politically-Loaded Geography

“Replacement geography” builds on the concept of “replacement theology,” a position that spurred anti-Semitism within the church and which, starting with Vatican II, has been removed from Christian doctrine. Indeed, it has been stated that recognition of the State of Israel by the Vatican completed this process.12 Replacement theology stated that Christians had inherited the covenant and replaced the Jews as the chosen people. The concept of replacement geography similarly replaces the historical connection of one people to the land with a connection between another people and the land.
This was famously applied by the Romans when they renamed Judea to Palaestinia, and Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina in 135 CE in an effort to destroy the Jewish people after the Bar Kokhba revolt. In more recent times, replacement geography has resulted in the destruction of Jewish artifacts at the Temple Mount.13
The inclusion of virtual Palestine, superimposed on Israel in the core layer of Google Earth, is an example of replacement geography advanced by technology. Those wishing to find directions, explore the cities of Israel, or randomly wander across this small piece of land are immediately taken to a politically motivated narrative unrelated to their quest. This is the sort of replacement the ancient Romans tried and failed to achieve. The promotion of a replacement narrative works against a compromise solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, inspiring absolutist positions rather than a negotiated settlement.

Main Implications

Generally, Google allows all kinds of organizations or individuals to create overlays with their own information on its map. These overlays are only available to those who specifically request them, but they are not automatically incorporated into the core map of Google Earth that every user entering its website can see. Disturbingly, Google has incorporated the Palestinians’ overlays and their accompanying narrative into its core maps of Israel. As Google maintains editorial control over its core layer, it has responsibility for its content, which it clearly has not adequately exercised.
Google Earth presents a tremendous challenge by allowing historical revisionism. Maps of the world have changed with evolving historical circumstances everywhere. Yet theoretically, with this tool, organizations seeking to make a claim for Mexican sovereignty over territories incorporated into the U.S. in the nineteenth century could raise such arguments by revising the map of Texas or California. Rather than serving as an educational resource, Google Earth could simply evolve into a website for political warfare.
For those who do not physically visit Israel, the “facts” on this virtual ground are real. It is to be expected that people will form their opinion on issues such as borders, land rights, and historic connection based on sources like Google Earth. The social propagation of a narrative of Israeli aggression and ethnic cleansing - an aspect of “Anti-Semitism 2.0″14 - is spread through Google Earth.
Without a response that includes new information about the historical connection of the Jewish people to Israel throughout the ages, as well as modern Israeli history and the Israel of today, the world’s opinion of Israel can only grow dimmer. An increase in content - assuming Google will eventually add it to the core layer, something that is far from certain - would address the vast imbalance, yet do little for the user experience.
A far better solution would be for Google to remove the narrative and treat Israel as it treats every other country on the globe. Both the Palestinian narrative and promotion of Israel can have their place, but this should be in optional layers. The core layer of Google Earth should be ideology free and not serve as a platform for indoctrination or a campaign to wipe Israel off the virtual map.
Sphere: Related Content

Answering Difficult Questions about Israel

Saturday, June 21st, 2008

“Zionism is racism.”

  • ADDRESS: This is simply untrue. Zionism is the Jewish national movement. Jews share a common history, language, culture and religion, just like many other nations.
  • REFRAME: We should apply the same standards to all nations. If the Syrians, Egyptians, and Brazilians are entitled to have their own states that bestow certain privileges to their own people, then why are the Jews condemned when they do the same? Where is the criticism of Jordanian nationalism that forbids Jews from becoming citizens? Saudi Arabia does not allow churches to be built nor does it permit the practice of other religions. Those are forms of discrimination that are rarely criticized. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You are talking anti-Semitism.”
  • MESSAGE: Zionism, having succeeded in re-establishing the Jewish state as a vibrant democracy, inspires freedom not only in Jews but in other minorities seeking self-determination.

“The Israel lobby has a harmful impact on U.S. policy.”

  • ADDRESS: This claim is misleading and inaccurate. Israel is a strategic asset to the United States. The two countries share similar economic, political, and security concerns.
  • REFRAME: Numerous ethnic, religious and special interest groups exercise their right to lobby government officials. With regard to the Middle East, pro-Arab and “Big Oil” lobbies continue to exert strong pressure over American foreign policy. While the Israel lobby seeks to advance the cause of Israel it does not speak for all pro-Israel groups which have differing views on foreign policy and often disagree on key issues. Similarly, the Taiwan lobby has been successful at influencing Asian policy. All foreign lobbies should be held to the same standards of scrutiny. Singling out the pro-Israel groups and accusing them of acting against American interests is unjust and unreasonable.
  • MESSAGE: The United States and Israel share similar values and concerns, and supporting the only democracy in the Middle East is in America’s best interest.

“Israeli presence in the disputed territories is responsible for the suffering of the Palestinians.”

  • ADDRESS: This statement distorts the facts. Israel does not want to keep a military presence in the West Bank; however, each time the IDF retreats, violence against Israelis escalates. This pattern can be seen clearly with the disengagement from the Gaza Strip and subsequent increase in rocket attacks.
  • REFRAME: The real cause of Palestinian suffering stems from the Arab leadership, which since 1948 has used the Palestinian refugees as political pawns against Israel. While Israel resettled over 700,000 Jewish refugees expelled from Arab countries, every attempt by Israel, the U.N., or the U.S. to resettle the Palestinian refugees and provide them a decent life was thwarted by the Arab regimes. Additionally, vast amounts of international aid given to the Palestinian Authority has been lost to corruption or used to finance terrorist activities, instead of being used to improve the lives of Palestinians.
  • MESSAGE: Palestinians will continue to suffer as long as Arab leaders focus on destroying the Jewish state rather than on creating better lives for their people.

“Israeli occupation is the root cause of the conflict.”

  • ADDRESS: This is simply untrue. Israel’s presence in the disputed territories is the result, not the cause, of ongoing Arab aggression against the Jewish people. Israel gained control of these territories through a defensive war fought in 1967.
  • REFRAME: Before the 1967 Six-Day War, there were no Israeli soldiers or citizens living in the West Bank or Gaza. These territories were occupied by Jordan and Egypt, respectively. Yet, there was terrorism against Israel. One example is the Egged bus massacre in March 1954, where eleven Israeli passengers were murdered and mutilated. Moreover, terrorism against Jews pre-dates the independence of Israel in 1948, with one example being the slaughter of 67 Jews in Hebron in 1929. Those who ignore the history of Arab terrorism and incitement fail to understand the complexities of the conflict.
  • MESSAGE: The root cause of this conflict is Arab rejection of Jewish sovereignty and freedom, and the ongoing incitement to hate which leads to terrorism against Israelis. Palestinians need to choose between peace and terrorism.

“Israel stops Palestinian ambulances at checkpoints.”

  • ADDRESS: It is unfortunate when any human being cannot get ample medical care in a timely manner.
  • REFRAME: However, you need to understand why these checkpoints exist in the first place. The Palestinian leadership has encouraged its young people to wage jihad against the Jewish state, and one tactic they employ to infiltrate Israel is to smuggle suicide bombers in seemingly innocuous vehicles like ambulances. In March 2002, Israeli forces found a 20-pound explosive belt hidden under a gurney in an ambulance that was carrying a teenager. This gruesome discovery saved the lives of both Palestinians and Israelis.
  • MESSAGE: The constant threat of war and the celebrated strategy of terrorism created the need for the checkpoints. When the violence ends the checkpoints will come down but, the murdered Israelis cannot be brought back to life.

“Israel is in violation of U.N. Res. 242 that calls on the state to return to its 1967 borders”

  • ADDRESS: This is not true. Israel is in fact in compliance with the 1967 U.N. resolution passed after the Six-Day War that calls for the “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.” The drafters of the resolution specifically refrained from using “all” or “the” before “territories,” thereby not requiring Israel to relinquish every inch of land it acquired in this defensive war. By leaving the Sinai Peninsula and Gaza Strip, Israel has in fact withdrawn from more than 90% of the territories it acquired.
  • REFRAME: It is the Arab regimes which are in clear violation of U.N. Resolution 242. This resolution calls for, “termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries, free from threats or acts of force.” Except for Jordan and Egypt, Arab states refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state and continue to provide material support to terrorist groups that threaten Israel and launch attacks against civilians.
  • MESSAGE: This conflict is not a border dispute and can only end when Arab regimes adhere to their obligations in Resolution 242 and accept Jewish self-determination and freedom in the Middle East.

“Israel is guilty of murdering innocent civilians in Lebanon.”

  • ADDRESS: It is tragic when civilians die in war, but this accusation twists the truth. While it is true that some civilians were accidentally killed during the war, as in any other war, the IDF is guided by a strict policy to protect civilian life whenever possible, regardless of nationality.
  • REFRAME: We must understand that Hezbollah ultimately bears responsibility for civilian deaths in Lebanon, especially during the 2006 conflict. This terrorist group utilized a ruthless strategy of attacking civilians with rocket fire in hundreds of Israeli towns and then cowardly hid behind Lebanese citizens. This tactic was in direct violation of the Geneva Conventions and led to unnecessary casualties during the war. U.N. officials also took note of this breach of international law and rightly condemned the terrorist group for their actions that put U.N. workers in serious danger.
  • MESSAGE: Israel has the right and the responsibility to protect its civilians, as all countries do. It’s absurd and contradictory to blame Israel for defending itself against the provocations of a terrorist organization that routinely tries to maximize civilian casualties on both sides.

“Israel is an apartheid state.”

  • ADDRESS: This accusation is simply untrue. All Israeli citizens, Jews and Arabs alike, regardless of age, gender, religion, or ethnicity, enjoy the same fundamental democratic freedoms, such as the freedom of speech, the freedom of association, the freedom of religion and the right to participate in the political process.
  • REFRAME: To understand true apartheid policies in the Middle East, we must look at the Muslim world where 150 million women are persecuted because of their gender. A rape victim in Saudi Arabia was recently sentenced to 200 lashes and imprisonment for being in the company of unrelated men. Honor killings and female circumcision continue to take place on a daily basis in many Arab and Muslim societies. Where is the outrage over the religious persecution faced by Christians and Jews in the Muslim world, where they are treated as second-class non-citizens through institutionalized discrimination? Condemning Israel, the lone democracy in a region made up of dictatorships that sponsor apartheid-like policies is unjust and hypocritical.
  • MESSAGE: While institutionalized racism and sexism are common in virtually every country throughout the Middle East, Israel is a bastion of pluralism and democracy.

“Israel has no right to build the wall.”

  • ADDRESS: The Israeli government has the right and the obligation to protect its citizens against terrorism.
  • REFRAME: While it is legitimate to disagree with Israel’s policies regarding the fence, it is illegitimate to view those policies in a vacuum, disregarding the fact that Israel built its security barrier only in direct response to relentless Palestinian terror attacks in 2000. It was erected in an attempt to prevent the infiltration of suicide bombers into Israeli towns and cities. Pakistan has a fence on its border with Afghanistan and the U.S. has a fence on its border with Mexico. If it is legitimate for other countries to erect a fence to prevent illegal immigration, it is certainly legitimate for Israel to erect a fence to defend its citizens against murder. Thankfully, the fence and other security measures have saved hundreds, if not thousands of lives.
  • MESSAGE: The Palestinian and Arab regimes have to choose between terrorism or open borders, between ongoing aggression or peaceful coexistence with Israel.

“Israel does not have the right to exit.”

  • ADDRESS: The Jewish people, like other nations have the right to self-determination. Israel’s primary right to exist is endorsed by U.N. Resolution 181, which called for a two-state solution in Mandated Palestine: one Jewish, and one Arab.
  • REFRAME: If we are going to question the legitimacy of Israel, then all countries in the Middle East must come under scrutiny. Prior to World War I, the majority of the Middle East was under the domain of the Ottoman Empire. Following its defeat, European leaders determined the boundaries of what would become Jordan, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. These states were all artificial creations, constructed by foreign, imperial powers. For example, the British allocated land east of the Jordan River to a leader of the Hashemite tribe, who was not indigenous to that region, and helped created Trans-Jordan (later to become the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan). The legitimacy of Jordan and other Middle Eastern states is never questioned. Why then is Isarel singled-out for so much attention?
  • MESSAGE: Those who question Israel’s legitimacy are holding the Jewish state to a different standard from all other countries. Israel, like all members of the U.N., has the same right to exist in peace and security, free from the threat of war.

“Both Israelis and Arabs are equally responsible for the conflict.”

  • ADDRESS: This is a common misconception.
  • REFRAME: There is no equivalent between the IDF and Arab terrorism. The IDF’s practice is to protect all civilian life and to defend the country against foreign aggressors. Arab terrorists stage a relentless campaign of suicide bombings and terrorist attacks, which are deliberately designed to destroy innocent lives. In fact, 57% of Palestinian Arabs support terrorist attacks upon Israeli civilians, according to research conducted at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem in September 2006. There is no moral equivalency between the educational system in Israel, where children are taught to love life and hope for peace with their Arab neighbors and the hate-education of the Arab world, where children are indoctrinated to believe that murdering Israelis will bring them to heaven.
  • MESSAGE: Israeli leaders have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Responsible Arab leaders are needed to do the same.

“A bi-national state would end the Arab-Israeli conflict.”

  • ADDRESS: This may appear to be a reasonable and even-handed solution to some.
  • REFRAME: But, we need to understand the real consequences of such a solution. Jews in a bi-national state would likely become a minority and would be vulnerable to persecution and genocide. The precedent for this claim is that for over a thousand years Jews and Christians living under Muslim rule throughout the Middle East were denied basic rights and freedoms, and subject to riots and pogroms in which countless Jews were killed. Furthermore, the Arab nations have never accepted the Jewish historical connections to the land of Israel and incitement against Jews continues in much of the Arab world today. It is clear that a bi-national state would only serve the interests of one side in this conflict.
  • MESSAGE: While Israel has yearned for peace throughout its history, those who advocate for a one-state solution are putting both Jewish and Christian lives in jeopardy.

Sphere: Related Content

Double Standards on Hamas Website

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

While Hamas English website blames Israel, Hamas Arabic website admits house exploded by Hamas.

#1 Arabic website Ezzedeen Al-Qassam Brigades - the armed branch of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas).

The “Martyr Brigades, Izz al-Din al-Qassam,” the military wing of the Islamic Resistance Movement “Hamas”, to live up to its martyrs who Ela Thursday (12 / 6), in an explosion in a house of Beit Lahia, was martyred as they put the final touches on their way to carry out the task of Jihad in particular.

The asphalt “Qassam”, the military statement issued Friday (13 / 6) martyrs and said they are “field commander Shahid Ashraf Naim desired fruit, and field commander Shahid Hassan Mohammed Abu Hqvh, Shahid field commander Magdi Adel Hammouda, the struggling divisions martyr Abu Mohammad Sabri survived , Shahid Mohammed Hamdan divisions struggling Xu, Shahid divisions struggling Munir Ahmed Sobeih, “adding they were” Knights sections of the unit who witnessed the arenas of jihad partnerships with many heroic, “according clarified.

The statement said the Qassam “on the path of Jihad and resistance; goes Qassam Miami men worshipped Zaki and sacrificed their bodies pure bridge crossing and access road to victory and liberation and empowerment, and on this thorny path goes to the heart convoys of innocent martyrs, who pay tax
Jihad from their blood and lives.”

The “Qassam” may also be termed “the hero martyr Mahmoud Attaya, Hamouda, a martyred girl Noor Magdi Hammouda daughter martyr leader Magdi Hammouda,” Treaty of God “on the path of jihad and martyrdom, and the blood of martyrs will not be lost in vain, and remain loyal to them and Palestine and the Aqsa ”

#2 English website Ezzedeen Al-Qassam Brigades - the armed branch of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas).

Zionist war planes destroyed a house completely,7 civilians were martyred.

Palestinian local sources reported that the Zionist war planes shelled a Palestinian house full of children and women.

Palestinian medical sources reported that seven Palestinians were martyred, at least more 40 wounded in the large explosion in northern Gaza on Thursday afternoon.

The incident occurred in the home of Ahmed Hamouda, a member of the Ezzedeen al Qassam Brigades, the military wing of Hamas. Palestinian witnesses confirmed that the explosion was caused by a Zionist airstrike.

The Palestinian medical sources reported that there are women and children among those wounded, five of them are said to be in serious condition.

The explosion resounded throughout the far corners of the city and the house has been completely destroyed. A number of neighboring residential buildings and business establishments were seriously damaged.

The Islamic resistance movement Hamas blamed the Zionist war planes in this attack against the Palestinian civilians.

Sphere: Related Content

The Big Lies

Friday, June 6th, 2008

A rough translation by Richard Landes of the French text of the final judgment of Philippe Karsenty’s court case makes damning reading for France 2 and its correspondent Charles Enderlin.

Despite this and the implications for media reporting on the Israel-Palestinian conflict, almost the entire mainstream media chose not to report on the case despite the fact that wire services Reuters and Associated Press did offer coverage at the time.

The al-Dura affair is one of a number of media manipulations and distortions covered in the exciting new interactive resource - The Big Lies.

You will be able to navigate through several case studies of untrue accusations that were reported as facts. Each study has an introduction, an explanation of the lie, the lie reported in the media, and the actual facts of the case.

If you haven’t already done so, check out The Big Lies by clicking here.

Sphere: Related Content